Svenska Aralsjösällskapet
Main authors
Lars Rydén | (main responsibilities: text) |
Christian Andersson | (main responsibilities: website, illustrations) |
Magnus Lehman | (main responsibilities: links and films) |
Reference group of researches and teachers
Paula Lindroos, PhD, Director Baltic University Programme, Åbo Akademi University, Finland
Martin Hauptvogl, Sustainable agriculture, Energy forest, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Slovakia
Magnus Andersson, PhD, Environmental policy, Traffic management, Energy management, Cajoma consulting, Sweden
Leena Lahti, PhD, Environmental education, University of Eastern Finland
Kristina Abolina, PhD. University of Latvia, Riga.
Tatjana Tambovceva, Prof. Economics and management, Riga Technical University, Latvia
Per-Arne Lindström, Sweden
Oleksandra Kovbasko, Freshwater Officer at WWF Danube-Carpathian Programme, Austria.
Linas Kliucininkas, Prof. Environmental management, Kaunas University of Technology, Lithuania
Tiina Elvisto, Prof. Plant ecology, Tallinn University, Estonia
Jan – Otto Anderson, Prof. Environmental economics, Åbo Akademi University, Finland
Marie Thynell, PhD. Sustainable development, Sustainable transport. University of Gothenburg, Sweden
Ciegis Remigijus, Prof. Development economics, Vytautas Magnus University, Lithuania
Michael Goodsite, PhD. Atmospheric chemistry, climate and global processes. Aarhus University, Denmark
Irek Zbicinski, Prof. Environmental management, Life-cycle assessment, Łódź University of Technology, Poland
Alexander Feher, Prof. Sustainable agriculture, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Slovakia
Jakub Kronenberg, PhD. Economy – environment interactions. University of Łódź, Poland
Kalev Sepp, Prof. Landscape management, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Estonia
Daniel Bergquist, PhD, Urban agriculture, Uppsala University, Sweden
Siarhei Darozhka, Prof. Environmental management. Belarusian State University, Belarus
Lars Emmelin, Prof. Sustainability planning, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden
Henrik Knudsen, Prof. Innovation, entrepreneurship. Aarhus University, Denmark
Artur Pawłowski, PhD. Lublin University of Technology, Poland
BUP Sustainable Development Course
1a.
Stories of societies which succeeded or collapsed
Sustainable development deals with the long-term prosperity or collapse of societies. Why is this a concern for us? The societies and countries we live in have a long history, thousands of years. Should we expect a collapse in the near future? Nevertheless, it is a threat that many are concerned with when it comes to the global society, all countries in the world. Collapse then does not mean eradication, but rather that there will be fundamental changes in the way things work. The reasons are that basic resources for us are coming to an end. Thus, fossil fuels, coal, oil and gas, become more difficult to find and prices are mounting. The so called “peak-oil”, the time of maximum production, has already passed for conventional oil and the peak approaches rapidly for other kind of fossil resources. At the same time the climate change caused mostly by the human combustion of fossil carbon and its consequences – disasters, such as storms, floods, and draughts and a melting arctic ice – aggravate. We also see declining or collapsing fish stocks, biodiversity decline and deforestation, and an increasing population on the planet. Will there be enough food for everyone? A basic requirement for today’s agriculture – production of phosphorous – is also rapidly emptied.
The concern for sustainable development is thus caused by questioning the continued successful development. Will we succeed or collapse? It is not difficult to find examples of societies which collapsed. The best known may be Easter Island. Easter Island is a small island in the vast expense of the Pacific outside the coast of Chile. It is known for its enormously large statues of human heads made of stone. When western seafarers “discovered” the island (on Easter day) in the 18th century, there was only a small group of people living in terrible conditions in a barren landscape. The stone heads witnessed about a once flowering society, which now had collapsed. An important reason of the collapse of the society was apparently the loss of the forest. The absence of trees made it impossible to build boats or canoes to fish, or to build decent houses.
The American geographer and physiologist Jared Diamond in his book “Collapse – how societies choose to fail or succeed” analyses a dozen societies, including the Easter Island, which failed, most of them ancient but some contemporary. He does not blame individuals, for example the person who cut down the last tree on Easter Island, but looks for developments in the societies. It is clear that they have a few things in common. On top of the list of causes of collapse are environmental impacts, in particular deforestation and destruction of soil.
In today’s discussion on sustainable development, deforestation is still a concern. Deforestation is driving climate change and is a main cause of biodiversity loss. It is included in the global negotiations on climate change under the title REDD, Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation. It is today mostly a question for the Southern Hemisphere, the tropical forests, but also in our societies we had a deforestation crisis, but in the 18th century. The forests were becoming clear-cut due to the large consumption of wood. It is interesting to note how the “crisis” was managed and avoided then; it is relevant for how we do today. The dealing with the European forest crisis led to the introduction of the term “Sustainability” for the very first time.
Our development has lead to societies in which most people have better, longer and healthier lives than earlier generations, but it had a price. Today’s concern for sustainable development is not in the first place concerned with a specific country. Again, it is as a global society we over-use the resources of our planet. We cut down forest, we over-fish the oceans, we use more energy than the Earth can provide in the longer term; and the end products from human activities pollute the environment too much. If this continues at some point it will lead to collapse, just as was the case in many societies, which already collapsed. Understanding and knowing sustainable development is needed to avoid this and instead create a prosperous future for this and coming generations.
Material for session 1a
Basic level
- Read the story of the Easter Island by Sverker Sörlin
- Watch the film with Sverker Sörlin on Easter Island (YouTube film)
- Read the European Forest Crisis and the origin of the sustainability concept
- See Jared Diamond introduce his book Collapse on collapsing societies (YouTube film)
Medium level (widening)
- View a presentation by Lars Rydén on: Climate existence seminar on resources
- Read chapter 25, pages 767-771 in Environmental Science: The Prospect of Sustainable Development
- Study the Mayan deforestation and the consequent collapse of the Mayan society. Also study Mayan and modern farming in Central America.
Advanced level (deepening)
Study in some detail an example of change from collapse to prosperity:
- Paolo Lugari, founder of Las Gaviotas (YouTube film)
Additional material
The film Home or Дом (in Russian) was made in 2009 to inspire all of us to be careful about our home planet Earth now in danger and avert the depletion of natural resources. It is a remarkable film., 1 hr and 33 min.
References
Diamond, J. 2005. Collapse – how societies choose to fail or succeed. Viking Books.
Rydén, L., Migula, P. and M. Andersson (eds). 2003. Environmental Science – understanding, protecting and managing the environment in the Baltic Sea region. Baltic University Press. Uppsala, Sweden.
Sörlin, S. 1997. The Story of Easter Island. In: A Sustainable Baltic Region 1. The road towards sustainability – a historical perspective. Baltic University Press. Uppsala, Sweden.
BUP Sustainable Development Course
1b.
The UN process – from Stockholm to Johannesburg
The global society has been concerned about the development and how it relates to the state of the environment since the Stockholm United Nations Conference on The Human Environment in June 1972. At the Stockholm conference, environmental concerns were for the first time established on the world agenda. It had been present in several national policies before that, but at the Stockholm meeting it was clear that environment was an international concern for the simple reason that pollution and resource depletion does not respect national borders. Pollutants travel with water or air long distances. Not the least, the Baltic Sea Region countries had experienced that from the acid rain, mostly coming from continental Europe and the British Islands.
The Stockholm conference led to a major strengthening of the environmental agenda in many countries, with the establishment of ministries of environment, environmental protection agencies and the United Nations Environmental Protection Agency, UNEP. The 1970s also saw a remarkable strengthening of environmental science, environmental law, and the banning of the most destructive chemicals in many countries. Since the Stockholm conference, June 5 is celebrated as the World Environment Day (see also Chapter 9a: Governance and Democracy).
If the early 1970s had been a time favourable for international cooperation and a “fairly mild” Cold War, the global atmosphere in the early 1980s was one of distrust and confrontation. The introduction of medium distance nuclear missiles on both sides of the iron curtain and the development of a new arms race, now in the space, made a 10-year follow-up of the Stockholm conference impossible. Instead, the United Nations established a so-called World Commission on Environment and Development, often called the Brundtland Commission after its chairperson, the Norwegian Prime Minister Gro Harlem Brundtland. This published its report Our Common Future in 1987. This is where the concept of Sustainable Development is introduced as a key concept on the global agenda.
An event at the Rio conference
The 1990s were again a period of many possibilities, after the 1989-91 dramatic events had led to the end of the Cold War and the dissolution of the Soviet Union. In 1992 the United Nations called the nations of the world to a new summit, the UN Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED). It took place in Rio de Janeiro in June 1992, and became the largest conference ever organized. 179 governments were represented and 120 heads of state took part. Five documents were issued from the conference, a most important one being the Agenda 21, a 40-chapter document for the 21st century on how to achieve sustainable development, every bit of it carefully negotiated and agreed on. Now, sustainable development became mainstream policy in most countries in the world.
After the Rio Conference, a Commission for Sustainable Development (CSD) was established at the United Nations to lead the international work. A number of important developments followed, among them the Climate Convention, the establishment of the Global Environmental Facility to finance sustainability projects, and support of green business.
The next big meeting was the World Conference in Johannesburg, South Africa in 2002, ten years after Rio. It was the first UN conference where the phrase ‘sustainable development’ was in the name of the meeting. It did not become quite the same main event as the Rio conference. The most important document was its Plan of Implementation. The discussion was now about concrete details on how to work. Science and business were given main roles, the sustainable production and consumption patterns important, and education for sustainable development, ESD, another important point on the agenda. Just months later, the UN General Assembly decided on the decade for education for sustainable development to be 2005-2014 (see also: Chapter 5a: Sustainable Production and Consumption and Chapter 12a: Education for Sustainable Development.)
In June 2012 the global society met in Rio again for the UN Rio+20 conference on sustainable development (UNCSD2012). This time the focus of the conference was green economy, reflecting that the economy is a top priority in most countries today and environmental concerns need to be included in economic development. The final document from Rio+20 is called The Future We Want, A main component is the agreement to develop as set of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). These are intended to follow the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and be a main focus in the UN work from 2015 when the MDG process ends.
Material for session 1b
Basic level
- Read The Road to Sustainability – The political history by Katarina Eckerberg. In: A Sustainable Baltic Region. Session 1.
- Watch Severn Cullis-Suzuki speaking at UN Earth Summit 1992 (YouTube Video)
- Watch Severn Cullis-Suzuki – A Call to Action for Canadians for Earth Summit 2012 (YouTube Video)
- Watch Maurice Strong's thoughts on Rio+20 in 2012 (YouTube Video)
- Read chapter 23, pages 693-697: International Co-operation for the Environment in: Environmental Science.
Medium level (widening)
- Read chapter 23, pages 697-702: International Co-operation for the Environment in: Environmental Science.
- Watch and listen to How NGO’s Can Get Involved in the Rio+20 Summit Process, Jan-Gustav Strandenaes (YouTube Video)
Advanced level (deepening)
Study in some detail the documents from the political process:
- Our Common Future – the report of the United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development also called the Brundtland Commission
- Agenda 21 and the other Rio documents
- The Johannesburg World Summit on Sustainable Development.
Additional Material
Sustainable Development Goals
The Future We Want
References
Rydén, L., Migula, P. and M. Andersson. 2003. Environmental Science – understanding, protecting, and managing the environment in the Baltic Sea region. Baltic University Press. Uppsala, Sweden.
Sörlin, S. (ed.). The Road Towards Sustainability. A Sustainable Baltic Region Session 1. Baltic University Press. Uppsala, Sweden.
1c.
Understanding sustainable development
The meaning of “sustainable development” should be kept simple: sustainability is a state which may continue in the long term, in fact forever. Sustainable development is a development, which brings us closer to sustainability. (Others consider sustainability and sustainable development to be the same thing.)
Sustainability normally refers to a system including not only society and people, but also nature or the environment. The system may be a city or a country, but today most often it is the whole world with everything on it, including nature, people, and our societies. For example, if someone talks about a sustainable economy, one may need to remind the person that the economy is part of a larger system and that it depends on all the component parts. One very often says that sustainable development has three dimensions, ecological (also called environmental), economic and social. However, these three parts of the system may be subdivided. Thus, the environment consists of the life forms, the atmosphere, the soil etc, while the social dimension may be divided into human welfare and society with all its institutions. It is obvious that the huge system under study has very many components.
The long term conditions required for sustainable development were used by the Brundtland Commission to create the most often used “definition” of sustainable development: “Sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs”. It contains within it two key concepts:
- the concept of 'needs', in particular the essential needs of the world's poor, to which overriding priority should be given; and
- the idea of limitations imposed by the state of technology and social organization on the environment's ability to meet present and future needs.
One may see the Brundtland report as a diplomatic compromise between the concern of the Third World for development and the first world for environmental protection.
Understanding sustainable development is quite often a personal matter; these personal views have to be respected – what is important for one person or another may differ very much. Nevertheless, there are some basic conditions, which need to be fulfilled if a society should continue to prosper in the long term. These conditions may be divided into physical, biological, and social. The physical conditions are summarized in the Natural Step conditions for sustainable development, often used in practical work in business and at the local, the city, level. Here the proper use of resources and non-accumulation of pollutants are in focus. The biological conditions remind us about that we all depend on the sun as a source of energy, and that diversity of life forms need to be conserved to maintain life in the longer term. The social conditions for sustainable development have been less well studied. So far we may say that they refer to proper governance of societies, human welfare and a limited human population. (see also Chapter 11b: Implementing Sustainable Development)
An important condition for sustainability is not to rely on non-renewable resources (such as fossil fuels) or use renewable resources (such as fish) above their regeneration capacity. One may also underline that the human population need to stay within the carrying capacity of the environment. Sustainable development thus in practice often become the proper management of limited resources. (See also Session 3b: Limits to Growth)
The conditions thus reminds us that the interaction between the human realm and nature need to work properly. It includes both the fact that nature provides us with resources – air to breath, water to drink and food to eat – but that it also takes care of all the waste emitted from the human society. The capacity of Nature to do this should not be overused to guarantee long-term survival, that is, sustainability. Sustainability also requires that a society works properly, and that nature in itself also needs to work properly. All of this is illustrated in the list of collapsed and successful societies (See Chapter 1a: Stories of Societies which Succeeded or Collapsed).
Material for session 1c
Basic level
- Read chapter 25, pages 772-778: The Prospect of Sustainable Development in: Environmental Science.
- Sustainable Development and Political Change. An interview with Gro Harlem Brundtland. (YouTube video)
Medium level (widening)
- Read chapter 2, pages 64-65: How the Environment Works – Turnover of Matter and Energy in: Environmental Science.
- Read relevant parts of chapter 3 and especially page 78: Ecology and Ecosystems in: Environmental Science.
Advanced level (deepening)
Compare the “definitions” of sustainable development used by different institutions.
- Brundtland Commission
- World Business Council for Sustainable Development
- The IUCN, published in their Caring for the Earth, 1990. Caring for the Earth: A Strategy for Sustainable Living
A more elaborate discussion on the concept of sustainable development by Robert W. Kates, Thomas M. Parris, and Anthony A. Leiserowitz, is found in the April 2005 issue of Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, Volume 47, No 3, pages 8–21.
DOI
References
Kates, R. W., Parris, T. M. and A. L. Leiserowitz. 2005. Environment Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, vol 47:3 pp 8 – 21.
Rydén, L., Migula, P. and M. Andersson (eds.). 2003. Environmental Science – understanding, protecting, and managing the environment in the Baltic Sea region. Baltic University Press, Uppsala, Sweden.
BUP Sustainable Development Course
1d.
What we believe in – Our values and sustainable development
Professor Arne Næss founder of the deep ecology philosophy campaigning for the Norwegian Green party in 2003.
Sustainable development is not only a political and scientific concept. It is also a value. The Brundtland commission underlined that sustainability is an ethics for our future. In the 1987 report, they write: “We have attempted to demonstrate how human survival and well-being may be dependent on our capacity to successfully transform the principles behind sustainable development into global ethics.”
There are several parts in this ethics. The value dimension of sustainable development may be expressed in terms of justice.
Firstly, those who support, or work for, sustainable development with respect for the needs of coming generations. When we ask for justice between this and coming generations, we ask for intergenerational justice. The weak point with this request of justice is that the next generation is far away in time and space. This feeling of distance may be reduced by referring to the grandchildren, who already are here, or the fact that most people like the thought that what they have built up is preserved.
Sustainability is about sharing resources of our planet, not only between us and coming generations, but also between us living here and now. It is called intra-generational justice, justice between us here and now. The principle that each human being has the same right to resources is included in the Rio Declaration. For example, in the climate negotiations the long-term goal seems to be that the per capita emissions of carbon dioxide should then be the same everywhere. This is today very far from the reality, and the gap between the poor and the rich is increasing. The gross violation of this value is by many judged as the most serious of all threats to sustainable development.
A third ethical principle of Sustainability is our obligations towards other life forms of the world, the animals, the plants, and the Nature in general. This is called bio-centric ethics or justice. Other life forms may not have duties towards us, but we have it towards them. The World Conservations Strategy, published by IUCN (International Union for the Conservation of Nature) in 1980 alarmed us about the rapid loss of biodiversity. The extinction of a number of life forms each year was seen as not only a problem for sustainable development, but also an ethical problem. We as humans do not have the right to “extinguish” these other forms of life. To this ethical statement are added concerns for resources, for the beauty of our world and the value of the natural world for coming generations. (See also: Chapter 6a: The living world)
We see the role of ethics increasing in many contexts. Ethics motivate people to care for the world around them and change their lifestyles. Ethics is used to clarify the role of values in policy decisions and choosing among alternatives of action. In sustainable development, the role of values and ethics are often underlined. It needs to be transparent to help us to choose our future.
Material for session 1d
Basic level
- Read relevant parts of chapter 21, especially pages 635-645: Behaviour and the Environment – Ethics, Education, and Lifestyle in: Environmental Science.
- Watch an interview with Prof William Hatcher (YouTube film).
- Watch an interview with Erwin Lazlo (YouTube film).
Medium level (widening)
- Read chapters 1, 2 and 3 by Mikael Stenmark in A Sustainable Baltic Region, Session 9: Foundations of Sustainable Development
Advanced level (deepening)
- See the films and study the attached material on Global Responsibility (YouTube film).
- Study the Earth Charter Initiative and read the Charter as a development of ethics for sustainable living.
- Explore the concept of Gaia and deep ecology. Watch Dr. Stephan Harding – Part 1 / 10 – Gaia Theory & Deep Ecology (YouTube film).
References
Rydén, L., Migula, P. and M. Andersson (eds). 2003. Environmental Science – understanding, protecting and managing the environment in the Baltic Sea region. Baltic University Press. Uppsala, Sweden.
Stenmark. M. 1997. Foundations of Sustainable Development. In: A Sustainable Baltic Region. Session 9. Baltic University Press. Uppsala, Sweden.
BUP Sustainable Development Course
Sida 3 av 15